|
Decorated Apparel
Industry Growth by Revenue Channels
(in Billion $)
SCR= Screen
Printing; EMB= Embroidery;
PROMO= Promotional Products;
HT= Heat Transfer; DTG= Direct to Garment
Inkjet
Source: PPAI, ASI, IMPRESSIONS,
EMB
Printed garments account for more
than half of decorated garments, and most are still screen-printed.
Direct-to-garment inkjet printing accounted for less than
1%, because it is still a new technology that has yet to
penetrate most garment decoration production plants. A market
research firm, I.T. Strategies, is projecting the world-wide
revenue of textile materials printed by direct-to-garment
digital printers to grow to $12.8 billion by 2010. If it
materializes, the share of direct-to-garment printing will
increase from less than 1% in 2006 to about 10% by 2010.
As we have discussed, there are a number of advantages to
digital printing. It is simply a matter of time and
availability of a wider range of products before digital
apparel printers achieve a higher rate of adoption. Meanwhile,
digital apparel printing is establishing itself as the preferred
method for short run decoration, particularly for promotional
apparel.
Although most garment printing is done by screen-printing
for now, the screen printers are busy adopting direct-to-garment
printing. According to the SGIA 2008 survey, garment decorators
planned to spend half of their digital output device purchasing
budget on direct-to-garment printers, compared to all other
types of digital output devices.10 The survey shows
that other types of digital methods, such as inkjet transfer,
dye sublimation and laser transfer, are in decline. These
older "heat applied graphics" require expensive
materials and are labor-intensive, resulting in higher operating
costs.
The adoption of direct-to-garment printers will accelerate
as higher throughput printers are introduced. I.T. Strategies
predicts that the direct-to-garment printer world-wide installed
base will increase to over 50,000 printers by year 2010
from a moderate beginning just a few years ago.11 We
are yet to see if this will materialize, but we have no
doubt a significant part of garment decoration will shift
from screen printing to direct-to-garment digital printing
in the coming years. A similar development took place in
the wide-format inkjet graphics printing market. The
installed base of wide-format inkjet printers replacing
screen printing grew from under 3,000 units in 1994 to over
60,000 units in just five years, a twenty-fold increase.
We believe a similar development is in the offing for direct-to-garment
printers.
Since garment decoration is a relatively simple business
that does not require a large physical space or many employees,
nearly a quarter of all garment decoration businesses are
run part-time. Besides, approximately 36% of all full-time
owners run their businesses from home. As their businesses
grow, an increasing number of owners are progressing from
part-time to full-time while home-based businesses are shifting
to commercial or industrial space.
The 2007 industry survey shows that a typical full-time
screen printing garment decorator had an average of $1.3
million revenue in 2006, compared to an average of $470,000
for a full-time embroidery business.8 This may indicate
that embroidery shops are generally smaller businesses than
screen printers - or it may indicate a changing trend
in favor of screen printed garments over embroidered garments.
Since less than 1% of all garment decoration utilizes digital
inkjet printers at present, there are still too few of them
from which we can derive comparable statistics for digital
garment printers. At present, we do not have any statistics
that apply to part-timers.
While the above division of the decorated garment industry
is based on the production methods, we would like to consider
a different perspective. We will classify the decorated
garment market into three groups based on perceived customer
needs. We have not yet seen anyone classify the market in
this manner, but it will serve a useful purpose as you plan
your marketing strategy.
<
Previous Next
>
|